People are making more images than ever before. Virtually everyone with a mobile phone has a digital camera to take pictures. Facebook says more than 350 million pictures are posted daily, which is more than the total USA population. This is only on their platforms.
In a moment where photography is readily available everywhere you see, the seminal collection of essays by Susan Sontag (published in 1977) On Photography, are still relevant to think about our relationship with images.
Photography as reality
With photography as a way of ‘collecting’ reality in a way we believe as accurate, Sontag warns about the traffic of images as proof, or even substitute, of the real world:
With social media photostreams, the ultimate attempt to control, frame, and package our lives, this idealized photographic image is visible, with extreme examples such as influencer fake travels.
Sontag comments that “ultimately, having an experience becomes identical with taking a photograph of it”, or as she recalls nineteenth-century aesthete Mallarmé who said everything in the world exists in order to end in a book, she claims: “today everything exists to end in a photograph.”
Photography as a mental frame
It is not only those things we photograph what represents our way of seeing, but the photographies to which we have constant exposure can also frame our responses towards beauty and pain, being capable of diminishing our behavioral and mental responses.
There are too many images of catastrophes and atrocity but we can’t go numb. We don’t need to see too many of them either. Just evaluate what is real and act accordingly.
As Jessica Helfand writes in The Self-Reliance Project series, stories of suffering are now a fixture in our news feeds. But it is images like Fabio Bucciarelli's portrait of a woman in her home in Gazzaniga, Italy, that cut through all the reportage and the rhetoric because they offer us a mirror on something else, something hard to see, perhaps, because it is so familiar.
To stop and reflect for a moment on the universality of one person’s profoundly human expression is an aggregation of everything you know to be true.”
Photography as participation and alienation
The act of photography has a duality of transforming the photographer into both an intimate observer of the frame, catching details that could skip the common eye, and an agent that is detached of its surroundings.
According to Sontag it would not be wrong to speak of people having a compulsion to photograph and turn the experience itself into a way of seeing, supporting the idea that photography interposes itself between us and the ‘real world’ in a way that merely looks like engagement, but is in fact satisfied with a symbolic, morally immobilizing gesture:
Photography and time
The capacity of photographs to achieve high detailed images and to “trap life” as it occurs, as mentioned by photographer Cartier-Bresson, gives it the ability to frame a unique reflection of reality during a specific time.
It is a way of collecting unrepeatable moments for future memory when perhaps you can’t remember them as precisely anymore.
It is also touching that what you capture will never be the same anymore. Your niece won’t be as little a baby, your face and body will change, the people in the background won’t be there the next time you go.
Photography is both an attempted antidote to our mortality paradox and a deepening awareness of it:
As stated by Paul Strand, your photography is a record of your living, for anyone who really sees. You may see and be affected by other people’s ways, you may even use them to find your own, but you will eventually have to free yourself from them.